@article{oai:tiu-tijc.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000207, author = {川田, 公仁 and Kawada, Kimihito}, journal = {研究紀要, Bulletin of Tsukuba International University}, month = {Mar}, note = {In this study, objective data of a team as a whole have been gathered about a game structure. The purpose is, through an objective evaluation by clarifying the circumstances of sets won and lost, and at the same time by making a comparison with preceding researches, to find out possible tasks to be improved. These findings, a coaching theory based on exercise-learning theory, can provide fundamental material for actual guiding. 1. Merits of Team U (1) The serving-point rate: the rate of Players 1, 2, and 6 (Table 1-3). (2) The rate of type-A ball-returning: the rate of the team (Table 2-1) and that of Player 1, an outstanding player (Table 2-2). (3) The successful spike rate: the rate of the team in a set won (Table 1-3), and that of Player 1 (Table 1-7). (4) The successful spike rate after type-A ball-receiving: the rate of the team (Table 3-2), and that of Player 4 (Table 3-7) in a set won. (5) The successful spike rate after type-A tossing: the rate of the team (Table 3-5), and that of Player 1 and 4 (Table 3-7) in a set won. (6) The type-A tossing rate of Player 3, a setter (Table 6). 2. What should be improved about Team U (1) The serving error rate: the rate of the team (Table 1-2) and that of Players 1, 4, and 5 (Table 1-3) in a set lost. (2) Reconsideration of serving order. (3) The successful spike rate after type-B ball-receiving: the rate of the team (Table 3-3) and that of Players 1, 4, and 5 (Table 3-7) in a set lost. (4) The choice of combination spi・ke patterns after type-A ball returning (Table 3-4). (5) The successful spike rate after type-B tossing: the rate of the team (Table 3-5) and that of Players 1, 2, and 4 (Table 3-7). (6) The point-winning rate: declining self-getting points and tendency to depend on the other team's errors in a set lost (Table 7). 3. Other characteristics of Team U. (1) The team should choose serving because the point-winning rate after serve-receiving is lower than 50% (Table 2-3). (2) As to skill plays, points won by spikes tend to be very high in a set won (Table 7). The result of spikes strongly influences the point-winning rate., 12, KJ00004129548, P}, pages = {87--98}, title = {児童におけるスポーツ競技の分析(4) : データを用いたバレーボールのチーム分析}, volume = {11}, year = {2005}, yomi = {カワダ, キミヒト} }